Thursday, January 26, 2006

The Poodle Wants a Filibuster

Will somebody please tell John Kerry who won the 2004 presidential election?

Turns out the Poodle --- having heard from his masters at the New York Times --- has decided that Democrats ought to filibuster the nomination of Samuel Alito to be the next Association Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

There is no cause but an ideological one for this course. And the voters resolved that question in the 2004 presidential election.

Republicans should suffer no nonsense on this issue. If Democrats attempt to filibuster the Alito nomination, Republicans should vow to vote against any nominee of a Democrat President if that individual is deemed "too Liberal."

12 comments:

Willis said...

It's unclear who won in 2004, given the ELECTION FRAUD. that was perpetrated.

Really, the Dems should just filibuster to force the Repukes' hand, make them nuke the filibuster, and get this threat thing over with.

Then, go to the media, ans say that the Repukes onlt play by the rules when the rules suit them, and they change the rules when that suits them.

So, I like it.

Willis said...

dang typos

James Young said...

willis, you're off you meds again. Typos are the least of your worries.

Willis said...

nice response, fpm Young

mitch's wife said...

Why do you call him "the poodle"? I've seen you refer to him thuis before and I don't get it.

James Young said...

Even you should like this one, MW. Annexed from Neal Boortz. He's French, and he's a kept man (twice): hence, the Poodle.

Willis said...

Ah, Neal Boortz. A fellow blowhard homo-hater.

You keep great company, fpm Young.

James Young said...

Willis, you are an idiot. If you knew anything about Neal, you'd know that his position on the issue is the same as yours.

Willis said...

He thinks there was election fraud??

James Young said...

No, on homos, willis.

Willis said...

Dang. You are a homo-lover by association, then fpm Young.

James Young said...

Whatchutalkin' 'bout, fl willis?