Thursday, January 26, 2006

The Poodle Wants a Filibuster

Will somebody please tell John Kerry who won the 2004 presidential election?

Turns out the Poodle --- having heard from his masters at the New York Times --- has decided that Democrats ought to filibuster the nomination of Samuel Alito to be the next Association Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

There is no cause but an ideological one for this course. And the voters resolved that question in the 2004 presidential election.

Republicans should suffer no nonsense on this issue. If Democrats attempt to filibuster the Alito nomination, Republicans should vow to vote against any nominee of a Democrat President if that individual is deemed "too Liberal."

5 comments:

James Young said...

willis, you're off you meds again. Typos are the least of your worries.

James Young said...

Even you should like this one, MW. Annexed from Neal Boortz. He's French, and he's a kept man (twice): hence, the Poodle.

James Young said...

Willis, you are an idiot. If you knew anything about Neal, you'd know that his position on the issue is the same as yours.

James Young said...

No, on homos, willis.

James Young said...

Whatchutalkin' 'bout, fl willis?